Intro
Good evening, I am your host Karen Hudes in this series on the Network of Global Corporate Control. Today's segment is about the Annual Meeting of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund that is being held in Washington DC. Annual meeting: s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/lannualmeeting.pdf
I am grateful to Carmen Stanley, Producer and Director; Mo Jackson, Audio & Prompter; and Marc Wesley, Floor Director. Full Transcript s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/dctvteleprompt10.4.16.pdf
I am grateful to Carmen Stanley, Producer and Director; Mo Jackson, Audio & Prompter; and Marc Wesley, Floor Director. Full Transcript s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/dctvteleprompt10.4.16.pdf
A Royal Flush
I mailed the Minutes of the meeting of the 25 Ministers of Development that is being held on October 8th to the embassies in Washington, and emailed them to New York Missions and Tokyo Embassies. These Minutes have been "tweeted" and "retweeted." These minutes demonstrate Humanity has the winning hand.
Not a single country has corrected these Minutes!
These Minutes tell you that the Global Currency Reset will replace paper currencies and eliminate that scam called country debt. Last year the World Bank and IMF Annual Meetings were held in Peru (2014). In Peru I met face-to-face with over 20 delegations, and the Board of Governors agreed that I speak for the 188 Ministers of Finance on the Board unless they rescind what I have said in writing. I also vote the shares of the United States on the Board of Governors during the interregnum, that is, while the US Constitution has been suspended by the US Congress. As we have learned in earlier segments, the US Congress suspends the Constitution of 1789 by declaring a state of emergency each year behind closed doors.
There have not been any corrections of minutes and here's why...
Let's talk about an email to me from Wolfgang Struck that Wolfgang sent me back in 2014 when Izumi Takahashi and I had sent Wolfgang tickets for him to join us in Tokyo. I "tweeted this email on September 24th, saying: "José Rizal was Trustee for 2 quadrillion Treaty of Versailles Bonds."
Not a single country has corrected these Minutes!
These Minutes tell you that the Global Currency Reset will replace paper currencies and eliminate that scam called country debt. Last year the World Bank and IMF Annual Meetings were held in Peru (2014). In Peru I met face-to-face with over 20 delegations, and the Board of Governors agreed that I speak for the 188 Ministers of Finance on the Board unless they rescind what I have said in writing. I also vote the shares of the United States on the Board of Governors during the interregnum, that is, while the US Constitution has been suspended by the US Congress. As we have learned in earlier segments, the US Congress suspends the Constitution of 1789 by declaring a state of emergency each year behind closed doors.
There have not been any corrections of minutes and here's why...
Let's talk about an email to me from Wolfgang Struck that Wolfgang sent me back in 2014 when Izumi Takahashi and I had sent Wolfgang tickets for him to join us in Tokyo. I "tweeted this email on September 24th, saying: "José Rizal was Trustee for 2 quadrillion Treaty of Versailles Bonds."
Gift of Love
"Statement of Karen Hudes for the Development Committee on behalf of the United States
10//2016 WASHINGTON - We are at a fork in the road for the Bretton Woods institutions. On January 3, 1949 José Rizal placed the world's monetary gold reserves and other asset commodities in trust as a gift of love, to be returned to humanity by the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF at the end of 50 years of sequestration.
The world's peoples and nations agreed to this gift of love. The terms of the trust are spelled out in the Bilateral Minesfield Breakthrough Successor Agreement. Humanity has the winning hand!
The gift of love prevents World War III and another Dark Ages. Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower accepted these terms on behalf of the people of the United States of America, and other nations are similarly bound by this sacred treaty. At the inaugural meeting of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank in 1946, the Governor for the United States of America reassured the other nations that the Bretton Woods institutions would respect the other nations' property in this trust by ensuring that it was up to the Board of Executive Directors to interpret the Articles of Agreement of the World Bank.
As a lawyer in the World Bank's legal department for twenty years, when the Articles of the World Bank were violated, I reminded the Board of Executive Directors that they were responsible for interpreting the Articles of Agreement. My efforts to reassert the rule of law at the Bretton Woods institutions were played out on the world stage after I bought a World Bank bond and sued in the US federal court system.
The Board of Governors has made me the Overseer Mandate Trustee of the trust containing the world's monetary gold reserves and other wealth. At the Annual Meetings in Lima, Peru in October, twenty delegations agreed that I speak on behalf of the Board of Governors on matters involving the world's monetary gold reserves and other wealth, and that any nation who disagreed would record their dissent in writing. The New York Missions and Tokyo embassies have confirmed this arrangement. This has enabled me to invalidate any and all attempts to disinherit the world's peoples as beneficiaries of the trust bequeathed to all of mankind as a gift of love."
Here's why no one has put a dissent in writing...
The Concept of Bailment Generally (in trust under international Law of Bailment in banks)
Bailment is not a concept that is new to English common law. Rather it is a principle which is firmly entrenched in English property and contract law. It has been recorded as early as the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in cases in these areas of law. The most significant and well-known of these cases would be the case of Coggs v Bernard, where Holt CJ sought to define the concept of bailment in arguably its most comprehensive form:
And there are six sorts of bailments. The first sort of bailment is, a bare naked bailment of goods, delivered by one man to another to keep for the use of the bailor; and this I call a depositum, and it is that sort of bailment which I mentioned in Southcote's case (1601) Cro Eliz 815.
The second sort is, when goods or chattels that are useful, are lent to a friend gratis, to be used by him; and this is called commodatum , because the thing is to be restored in specie.
The third sort is, when goods are left with the bailee to be used by him for hire; this is called locatio et conductio, and the lender is called locator , and the borrower conductor.
The fourth sort is, when goods or chattels are delivered to another as a pawn, to be a security to him for money borrowed of him by the bailor; and this is called in Latin vadium, and in English a pawn or a pledge.
The fifth sort is when goods or chattels are delivered to be carried, or something is to be done about them for a reward to be paid by the person who delivers them to the bailee, who is to do the thing about them.
The sixth sort is when there is a delivery of goods or chattels to somebody, who is to carry them, or do something about them gratis, without any rewards for such his work or carriage, which is this present case. I mention these things, not so much that they are all of them so necessary in order to maintain the proposition which is to be proved, as to clear the reason of the obligation, which is upon persons in cases of trust.
In light of the above, it is clear to see the concept of bailment can relate to everyday scenarios which one might encounter whereby possession of property is transferred; however the ownership of the property remains unchanged.
www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/criminal-law/the-concept-of-bailment-generally.php
Humanity owns the Global Debt Facility peroid - Humanity has the winning hand!!!
10//2016 WASHINGTON - We are at a fork in the road for the Bretton Woods institutions. On January 3, 1949 José Rizal placed the world's monetary gold reserves and other asset commodities in trust as a gift of love, to be returned to humanity by the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF at the end of 50 years of sequestration.
The world's peoples and nations agreed to this gift of love. The terms of the trust are spelled out in the Bilateral Minesfield Breakthrough Successor Agreement. Humanity has the winning hand!
The gift of love prevents World War III and another Dark Ages. Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower accepted these terms on behalf of the people of the United States of America, and other nations are similarly bound by this sacred treaty. At the inaugural meeting of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank in 1946, the Governor for the United States of America reassured the other nations that the Bretton Woods institutions would respect the other nations' property in this trust by ensuring that it was up to the Board of Executive Directors to interpret the Articles of Agreement of the World Bank.
As a lawyer in the World Bank's legal department for twenty years, when the Articles of the World Bank were violated, I reminded the Board of Executive Directors that they were responsible for interpreting the Articles of Agreement. My efforts to reassert the rule of law at the Bretton Woods institutions were played out on the world stage after I bought a World Bank bond and sued in the US federal court system.
The Board of Governors has made me the Overseer Mandate Trustee of the trust containing the world's monetary gold reserves and other wealth. At the Annual Meetings in Lima, Peru in October, twenty delegations agreed that I speak on behalf of the Board of Governors on matters involving the world's monetary gold reserves and other wealth, and that any nation who disagreed would record their dissent in writing. The New York Missions and Tokyo embassies have confirmed this arrangement. This has enabled me to invalidate any and all attempts to disinherit the world's peoples as beneficiaries of the trust bequeathed to all of mankind as a gift of love."
Here's why no one has put a dissent in writing...
The Concept of Bailment Generally (in trust under international Law of Bailment in banks)
Bailment is not a concept that is new to English common law. Rather it is a principle which is firmly entrenched in English property and contract law. It has been recorded as early as the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in cases in these areas of law. The most significant and well-known of these cases would be the case of Coggs v Bernard, where Holt CJ sought to define the concept of bailment in arguably its most comprehensive form:
And there are six sorts of bailments. The first sort of bailment is, a bare naked bailment of goods, delivered by one man to another to keep for the use of the bailor; and this I call a depositum, and it is that sort of bailment which I mentioned in Southcote's case (1601) Cro Eliz 815.
The second sort is, when goods or chattels that are useful, are lent to a friend gratis, to be used by him; and this is called commodatum , because the thing is to be restored in specie.
The third sort is, when goods are left with the bailee to be used by him for hire; this is called locatio et conductio, and the lender is called locator , and the borrower conductor.
The fourth sort is, when goods or chattels are delivered to another as a pawn, to be a security to him for money borrowed of him by the bailor; and this is called in Latin vadium, and in English a pawn or a pledge.
The fifth sort is when goods or chattels are delivered to be carried, or something is to be done about them for a reward to be paid by the person who delivers them to the bailee, who is to do the thing about them.
The sixth sort is when there is a delivery of goods or chattels to somebody, who is to carry them, or do something about them gratis, without any rewards for such his work or carriage, which is this present case. I mention these things, not so much that they are all of them so necessary in order to maintain the proposition which is to be proved, as to clear the reason of the obligation, which is upon persons in cases of trust.
In light of the above, it is clear to see the concept of bailment can relate to everyday scenarios which one might encounter whereby possession of property is transferred; however the ownership of the property remains unchanged.
www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/criminal-law/the-concept-of-bailment-generally.php
Humanity owns the Global Debt Facility peroid - Humanity has the winning hand!!!
Thank you for listening to another segment of "The Network of Global Corporate Control." Many people have learned about the corruption in our money system, and about humanity’s wealth in the Global Debt Facility. We have reached critical mass. Jose Rizal, then Superior General of the Society of Jesus, and his lawyer Ferdinand Marcos, established the Global Debt Facility, administered by the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF. As Overseer Mandate Trustee, I am claiming the power of José Rizal, Superior General of the Jesuits, on behalf of humanity, to implement the Global Currency Reset. Until next week, I am your host, Karen Hudes. |